Comments for Partecipativo.Com

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by sonofpikaia

sonofpikaia — Fri, 18 May 2012 03:09:00 +0000

>>and thus inferior<< you don’t find this in the origin of man, you made that up your self.

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by MGGoblin

MGGoblin — Fri, 18 May 2012 03:06:23 +0000

It was not a direct quote. It is a conclusion wich Darwin points to. Evolution was discovered many years before Darwin, and Darwin never uses the word “Evolution” – he uses the term Natural Selection. Lamarck is the first one to discover the phenomena of evolution, not Darwin, who is a charlatan and a plagiarist – he drinks from Malthus and Spencer, both charlatans and proto-nazi imperialists…

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by sonofpikaia

sonofpikaia — Fri, 18 May 2012 03:06:14 +0000

No Darwin doesn’t point to that. in fact he was against slavery in his time.
He didn’t drink from spencer, in fact spencer has written morality and god books before The origin of species.
the modern terminology (not his philosophy) we are using today on the subject of evolution are from spencer.
but spencers evolution and ethics is from 1879, spencer has read darwin not other way around.
get your history lined up boy!
because we don’t like neodarwinism doesn’t mean evolution is on true

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by MGGoblin

MGGoblin — Fri, 18 May 2012 02:32:00 +0000

No! ¿Man do you know history? “He doesn’t point to that” – ¿Comparing blacks to apes is not racism? ¿Who told you he was against slavery? He didn’t!!! And no. In the Origin of Species (you should know it’s real name) Darwin clarifies that he is applying Malthus & Spencer’s ideas, doesn’t matter if they write books on morality, they don’t believe in it… And one more point, I never said “evolution is not true” – on the contrary natural selection is not true, evolution is a fact.

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by MGGoblin

MGGoblin — Fri, 18 May 2012 02:20:12 +0000

And secondly, in darwinism these are the clear and most important facts: Randomness, Natural Selection, Struggle for Survival. – Evolution is not about this, it’s about development, not struggle (although ocasionally it is, but it’s secondary), the changes in the organisms are the result of Action-Reaction, Cause-Effect, not randomness (the last discoveries in science points to this) and natural selection is an empty concept, since the changes are to complex to be explained by this.

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by sonofpikaia

sonofpikaia — Fri, 18 May 2012 01:42:28 +0000

I don’t know who explained you Darwin’s evolution theory?
But Randomness is not in the game.
it’s 1 heredity 2 variation 3 natural selection.
and its not to complex to be explain, read the “greatest show on earth” there you can see al the lab tests with DNA over 20 years evolution in lower live forms with a high generation rate.

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by MGGoblin

MGGoblin — Fri, 18 May 2012 01:31:59 +0000

And I don’t know who explained it to you. Randomness is at the core. Mutations are random, according to darwinism. Mutations (or here, you use the term “variation”) are random, and according to darwinism, evolution is a random process. And another thing, the experiment you pointed does not contradict my arguments, because I’m not saying that evolution is not real, just that 1- It’s not random. 2- The cause for evolution is not the “struggle” for life. 3- There is no “selection”.

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by MGGoblin

MGGoblin — Fri, 18 May 2012 01:05:11 +0000

My friend, evolution is very real. But Darwin is wrong. Evolution was discovered 50 years (and perhaps much more…) before Darwin, by Lamarck and other scientists. Their view of evolution was about a dynamic, intelligent process of life development, with Darwin we come to struggle for life and the fight for “limited resources” (Malthus) and then the survival of the fittest (Spencer).

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by sonofpikaia

sonofpikaia — Fri, 18 May 2012 00:09:24 +0000

You’re ended up in some sort of naturalistic fallacy.
do you really believe that their is no struggle and limited resources in nature?

Comment on MALTHUS AND POPULATION : TEN MINUTE GUIDE by sonofpikaia

sonofpikaia — Thu, 17 May 2012 23:49:00 +0000

you obviously don’t understand darwinian evolution?
I don’t use the term variation for your randomness. I mean variation = no body is the same.
so the circumstances in nature select blind without purpose. the ones who survive give there genes to the next generation who also will be exposed to the same blind selection.
What is not right in this theory?